Wednesday, March 13, 2013

How Technology Has Affected Our Etiquette


I read this interesting article from the New York Times the other day. It dealt with our online etiquette and how it has changed over the years. What fascinated me most about this article was the validity of the author’s main point. He stated that most people have less patience when it comes to receiving thank-you emails, texts, or requests for information easily found on Google.
When email first started becoming the normal communication medium for businesses, it was customary to send a thank-you email, or even an “I got your email” email. Nowadays, it appears more people are becoming increasingly frustrated by these types of emails. According to Baratunde Thurston, co-founder of Cultivated Wit, he has seen “decreasing amounts of tolerance for unnecessary communication because it is a burden and a cost.” In a world where time is money and everyone is scrambling to get more of both, unnecessary communication is becoming more of a hindrance, rather than a rule of etiquette.
This annoyance is not just with email however. It carries over into voicemail and simple requests easily answered by Google. A few years ago, when someone left you a voicemail you generally listened to it without a moment’s hesitation or pause. There was no annoyance, but rather a curiosity as to who left you the voicemail in the first place and the urgency of the message. Now, according to the article in the New York Times, people are frustrated when you leave them a voicemail. The author states that the reason for this is because so many people are attached to their mobile devices, and it is so much easier to send a text rather than leave a voicemail that you have to listen to. This process is considered time consuming.
Then there’s Google. I have found this to be particularly true, that when someone asks me what the weather is, I find myself annoyed. There are times I don’t know what the weather is going to be and I have to look it up on my phone anyway. So, in my head I’m wondering why they didn’t just look it up in the first place. Then again, there is something to be said of human interaction. After all, it is true what they say, that you can’t trust everything you read on the Internet. In the case of checking weather however, I think as a general rule you are safe with what you see online.
While this article has some key points, there are still some people that prefer to talk to you on the phone rather than through text, who want to ask you personally about something, or who still insist on sending you a thank-you email. So, what do you do?
In any given situation, it is always best to know your audience. Also, keep in mind the context of the situation. For example, if you want to know someone’s schedule for the week, a text is probably not the most efficient way to ask for this information. Giving them a call, or even letting them respond via email will not only please your audience, but you are likely to get the information you are searching for quicker. It is much faster to talk on the phone or type on the computer than it is to text, so most people would prefer these communication mediums when asking complex questions. For simple notes, such as telling someone you are on your way to the meeting, a text is sufficient.
All in all, you want to make sure you understand the audience and the situation when deciding how to contact someone. You also want to keep in mind the evolving technologies and how people are using them. Say for instance, video communication. If you see an upward trend in the amount of video conferencing, chances are more people will prefer this communication (just giving an example).
Well that is all for this week. What do you guys think? Are you annoyed by simple emails, voicemails, and simple questions? Or do you think that this type of etiquette should still be in use regularly?
Let me know your thoughts below, and as always, I thank you for listening.


Until next time,

Julie

 

Sources:

Thursday, March 7, 2013

Working From Home: Is this Good or Bad for Companies?


Lately, I have been hearing about more and more employees working remotely (from home) at least one day a week. This is a trend that has grown pretty steadily in the last 10 years, and research indicates the number of remote workers will only continue to rise.
So why the sudden debate over this trend’s impact on productivity and company costs? The recent media coverage of this can probably be attributed to Yahoo’s change in policy. A few weeks ago, Marissa Mayer, Yahoo Inc. CEO, announced she will be abolishing Yahoo’s age old work from home arrangements. Mayer believes that employees are more productive when they work together and are better able to bounce ideas off each other, something remote workers don’t experience.
For some companies, having employees report to the office makes sense, such as in Yahoo’s case. Many of their full-time employees who worked remotely “did little work” and some even started their own companies on the side. This is not to say that workers can never work from home if they need to, such as if a child is sick, but Yahoo’s ban is on full-time remote employees.
There are arguments both for and against home-based workers, and there are advantages and disadvantages to both. Many employers worry that employees who stay at home dawdle in their pajamas all day, and research suggests that workers who work from home at least one day a week are more likely to use Mondays or Fridays as their days to stay home, extending their weekend. Having employees in the office increases the chance they will be productive, but also increases costs in the form of real estate. Requiring workers to be in the office also requires said employees to have an office space in which to work.
Conversely, research has suggested that productivity is higher for companies who allow their workers to work from home at least once a week.  A study by Stanford University and Beijing University discovered that Chinese call-center workers used their time more efficiently and took fewer breaks, if they were allowed to stay home. Also, stay-at-home workers don’t require an office, and that can cut down on real estate costs.
The industries that have seen the most dramatic shift in home workers include management, business, and finance. In these industries, 1 in 4 employees work from home, and almost half are self-employed. Even government has seen a shift in home-based workers, particularly state governments. The biggest shift however is in the computer, engineering, and science fields. The amount of home-based workers has increased by 70% in 10 years (from 2000 to 2010).
While there is still debate about productivity and costs, Cisco conducted a study in 2008 that revealed Americans who work from home are happier. Whether this is because they don’t have to commute, or the idea of working from home alludes to flexibility, working from home does seem to have its advantages.
What do you guys think? Should companies allow their workers to work from home once a week, or should employees always be required to be on-site? Let me know in the comments below!

Thanks!
Julie

 

Sources: